Like most adults I have a fair quantity of scars on my
body, mostly on my hands. The majority of these marks and disfigurements are
minor, nonetheless it often strikes me as surprising that so many of us manage
to retain all of our fingers through life. Considering the many dangerous
things we do with our hands, it is a testament to our skills and foresight (and
no small amount of first aid and general hygiene) that our hands are often in
such good shape.
We commonly speak of scars as acquisitions, as things we
obtain through mishap and misadventure. Scars are additions, and sometimes, in
the more extreme cases, evidence of subtractions from the body – from what we
would otherwise have.
It is common also to speak of skills as acquisitions – as
abilities we gain through practice and experience. Knowledge also, is a
capacity we tend to think of as an acquisition.
To acquire something is to gain, or to form, a certain kind
of possession, typically of an object or else a demeanour, attitude,
disposition or tendency. In these latter cases the term “acquisition” is used
in a technical sense that could just as easily be replaced with adopting an attitude, forming a disposition or developing a tendency.
In ordinary usage, acquisition most commonly pertains to
objects or other forms of material wealth. To acquire a trophy is usually –
trophy-scars notwithstanding – both to acquire an object as well as the
admiration, acclaim or appreciation for which it stands. But to gain
recognition is not actually to acquire anything so much as it is an increased
likelihood to be treated preferentially by people in the know. It is very
common for such social achievements to be recognised through the use of material
tokens: trophies, epaulettes, titles etc.
So, like our less extreme scars, acquisitions are most
commonly additions to what we already possess and whilst such possessions may
take up little space, they do nonetheless need to be accommodated. Even digital
information needs to be stored.
It is no surprise therefore that we tend to describe skills
and knowledge in terms of content, as things we bundle away in our heads ready
for later use. It’s as if our brains were vast repositories of information
which we routinely access in the same way we retrieve books from a library or
artefacts from a museum. If we acquire stuff, then it follows that we need
somewhere to store it. And what better place than the brain? But what seems
obviously the case is not necessarily the case.
Consider our hands again. When we learn to play the piano we
do not speak of acquiring new additions to our hands. Our hands are not
repositories. They do not store their capacities, even though they clearly have
capacities, or at least they participate to a very large degree in the capacities
of the person as a whole. When we learn a new technique requiring dexterity, we
may develop the musculature of our digits etc. but there are no new hand acquisitions as such – not, of course,
unless we inherit another scar or two. And if we are unfortunate enough develop
carpal tunnel syndrome, arthritis or ganglion cysts these are not strictly
speaking acquired – they develop or
arise. The capacity was already there.
Many critics of the notion of mental content continue to
speak of “skill acquisition” or “knowledge acquisition” as if there were no
ground to be lost as a consequence. I’m not so sure the term helps us. In fact
I think it may be a hindrance. Perhaps it would make more sense to speak of
knowledge and skills in the same way that we regard the changes that occur in our
hands when we learn a new technique. Perhaps we should make a point of
regarding skills and knowledge as developmental
changes rather than as acquisitions. You cannot acquire a development but you
can develop a skill and you can develop your knowledge. Organisms and organs are
things that develop. There is no room in a brain for any acquisitions. All the
space is already taken. Knowledge and skills are develop-mental.
0 comments:
Post a Comment